重思 “解释世界” 与 “改变世界” 的经典命题

Rethinking the Classical Propositions of "Explaining the World "and "Changing the World "

摘要:

马克思 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》 第十一条在学界引发了诸多争论, 其焦点在于如何理解 “哲 学家们” 的指涉对象、 马克思是否放弃 “解释世界” 的理论诉求以及 “解释世界” 与 “改变世界” 之间存 在何种关系的问题。 在笔者看来, 探讨 “哲学家们” 的指涉对象理应自觉置于马克思创作 《关于费尔巴哈 的提纲》 的学术背景和时代环境进行考察, 马克思视域中的 “哲学家们” 实际上具体指向某一类人; 在是 否放弃 “解释世界” 的诉求上, 马克思确实舍弃了哲学性质维度的 “解释世界”, 但并没有完全放弃哲学认 知意义上的 “解释世界”; 在 “解释世界” 与 “改变世界” 的关系上, 要结合马克思的思想发展进程以及哲 学观变革的意义予以整体审视。 在新的时代背景下, 重思 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》 第十一条, 对继承与发 扬马克思的实践哲学精神及其价值旨趣具有重要意义。

Abstract:

The article 11 of Marx_'s Theses on Feuerbach has aroused a lot of controversy in the academic circle which focuses on how to understand the referent object of _"philosophers_"whether Marx gave up the theoretical appeal of _"explaining the world _", and what kind of relationship exists between _"explaining the world_" and _"changing the world _" In the author _'s opinion the reference object of _"philosophers _" should be consciously investigated in the academic background and historical context of Marx _' Theses on Feuerbach. _"Philosophers_" in Marx _'s vision actually refer to a certain kind of people. In whether to give up the appeal of_"explaining the world_" Marx did abandon the_"explaining the world_" of philosophical nature dimension but did not completely give up the _"explaining the world _" of philosophical cognition. In terms of the relationship between _"explaining the world _" and _"changing the world _", we should examine the whole process of Marx_'s thought development and the significance of the reform of philosophical outlook. Under the background of the new era rethinking article 11 of the Theses on Feuerbach is of great significance for inheriting and developing Marx _'s practical philosophy.